↓ Skip to main content

Coronaviruses: emerging and re-emerging pathogens in humans and animals

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coronaviruses: emerging and re-emerging pathogens in humans and animals
Published in
Virology Journal, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12985-015-0432-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanna K. P. Lau, Jasper F. W. Chan

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and recently emerged Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) epidemics have proven the ability of coronaviruses to cross species barrier and emerge rapidly in humans. Other coronaviruses such as porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) are also known to cause major disease epidemics in animals wiith huge economic loss. This special issue in Virology Journal aims to highlight the advances and key discoveries in the animal origin, viral evolution, epidemiology, diagnostics and pathogenesis of the emerging and re-emerging coronaviruses in both humans and animals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 201 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 67 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Other 49 24%
Unknown 74 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,620,037
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#124
of 3,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,684
of 398,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#5
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.