↓ Skip to main content

Primary cutaneous nocardiosis: a diagnosis of consideration in a renal transplant recipient

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Clinical Pathology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary cutaneous nocardiosis: a diagnosis of consideration in a renal transplant recipient
Published in
BMC Clinical Pathology, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12907-018-0075-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priyatam Khadka, Dibya Singh Shah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 13 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,546,615
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from BMC Clinical Pathology
#57
of 117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,657
of 343,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Clinical Pathology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.