↓ Skip to main content

Horizontally transferred genes cluster spatially and metabolically

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Horizontally transferred genes cluster spatially and metabolically
Published in
Biology Direct, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13062-015-0102-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Dilthey, Martin J. Lercher

Abstract

Genomic uptake of DNA by prokaryotes often encompasses more than a single gene. In many cases, several horizontally transferred genes may be acquired together. Accordingly, we expect that horizontally transferred genes cluster spatially in the genome more often than expected if transfers were independent. Further, genes that depend on each other functionally may be unlikely to have beneficial fitness effects when taken up individually by a foreign genome. Hence, we also expect the co-acquisition of functionally related genes, resulting in the clustering of horizontally transferred genes in functional networks. Analysing spatial and metabolic clustering of recent horizontal (or lateral) gene transfers among 21 γ-proteobacteria, we confirm both predictions. When comparing two datasets of predicted transfers that differ in their expected false-positive rate, we find that the more stringent dataset shows a stronger enrichment of clustered pairs. The enrichment of interdependent metabolic genes among predicted transfers supports a biologically significant role of horizontally transferred genes in metabolic adaptation. Our results further suggest that spatial and metabolic clustering may be used as a benchmark for methods that predict recent horizontal gene transfers. This article was reviewed by Peter Gogarten in collaboration with Luiz Thiberio Rangel, and by Yuri Wolf.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 21%
Computer Science 3 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2016.
All research outputs
#5,642,829
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#203
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,431
of 389,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.