↓ Skip to main content

The clinician-scientist track: an approach addressing Australia’s need for a pathway to train its future clinical academic workforce

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The clinician-scientist track: an approach addressing Australia’s need for a pathway to train its future clinical academic workforce
Published in
BMC Medical Education, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12909-018-1337-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diann S Eley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Other 6 13%
Unspecified 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Unspecified 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2020.
All research outputs
#13,391,058
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,658
of 3,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,271
of 344,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#27
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.