You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of single use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) compared to standard of care in reducing surgical site complications (SSC) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13019-018-0786-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leo M Nherera, Paul Trueman, Michael Schmoeckel, Francis A Fatoye |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 49 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,918,223
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#93
of 1,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,622
of 343,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.