↓ Skip to main content

A novel approach for metabolic pathway optimization: Oligo-linker mediated assembly (OLMA) method

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Engineering, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel approach for metabolic pathway optimization: Oligo-linker mediated assembly (OLMA) method
Published in
Journal of Biological Engineering, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13036-015-0021-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shasha Zhang, Xuejin Zhao, Yong Tao, Chunbo Lou

Abstract

Imbalances in gene expression of a metabolic pathway can result in less-yield of the desired products. Several targets were intensively investigated to balance the gene expression, such as promoter, ribosome binding site (RBS), the order of genes, as well as the species of the enzymes. However, the capability of simultaneous manipulation of multiple targets still needs to be explored. We reported a new DNA assembling method to vary all the above types of regulatory targets simultaneously, named oligo-linker mediated assembly (OLMA) method, which can incorporate up to 8 targets in a single assembly step. Two experimental cases were used to demonstrate the capability of the method: (1) assembly of multiple pieces of lacZ expression cassette; (2) optimization of four enzymes in lycopene biosynthetic pathway. Our results indicated that the OLMA method not only exploited larger combinatorial space, but also reduced the inefficient mutants. The unique feature of oligo-linker mediated assembly (OLMA) method is inclusion of a set of chemically synthetic double-stranded DNA oligo library, which can be designed as promoters and RBSs, or designed with different overhang to bridge the genes in different orders. The inclusion of the oligos resulted in a PCR-free and zipcode-free DNA assembly reaction for OLMA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Lithuania 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 23%
Engineering 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,433,196
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Engineering
#212
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,958
of 390,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Engineering
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.