You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adult Niemann-Pick disease type C in France: clinical phenotypes and long-term miglustat treatment effect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-018-0913-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yann Nadjar, Ana Lucia Hütter-Moncada, Philippe Latour, Xavier Ayrignac, Elsa Kaphan, Christine Tranchant, Pascal Cintas, Adrian Degardin, Cyril Goizet, Chloe Laurencin, Lionel Martzolff, Caroline Tilikete, Mathieu Anheim, Bertrand Audoin, Vincent Deramecourt, Thierry Dubard De Gaillarbois, Emmanuel Roze, Foudil Lamari, Marie T. Vanier, Bénédicte Héron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,141,707
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,536
of 2,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,144
of 343,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#33
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.