↓ Skip to main content

Cherubism: best clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cherubism: best clinical practice
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-7-s1-s6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria E Papadaki, Steven A Lietman, Michael A Levine, Bjorn R Olsen, Leonard B Kaban, Ernst J Reichenberger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Postgraduate 16 13%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Other 10 8%
Other 35 29%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 24 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,100,987
of 21,814,108 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#829
of 2,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,291
of 296,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,814,108 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.