↓ Skip to main content

Cherubism: best clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cherubism: best clinical practice
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-7-s1-s6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria E Papadaki, Steven A Lietman, Michael A Levine, Bjorn R Olsen, Leonard B Kaban, Ernst J Reichenberger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 150 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 18 12%
Student > Master 18 12%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 39 25%
Unknown 38 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Unspecified 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 44 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,531,565
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#904
of 2,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,321
of 165,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.