You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What evidence exists on the impact of governance type on the conservation effectiveness of forest protected areas? Knowledge base and evidence gaps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-015-0051-6 |
| Authors |
Biljana Macura, Laura Secco, Andrew S. Pullin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 24% |
| Researcher | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 83 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,747,899
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#169
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,436
of 404,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.