↓ Skip to main content

Exciting new advances in oral cancer diagnosis: avenues to early detection

Overview of attention for article published in Head & Neck Oncology, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exciting new advances in oral cancer diagnosis: avenues to early detection
Published in
Head & Neck Oncology, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1758-3284-3-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ravi Mehrotra, Dwijendra K Gupta

Abstract

The prognosis for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma remains poor in spite of advances in therapy of many other malignancies. Early diagnosis and treatment remains the key to improved patient survival. Because the scalpel biopsy for diagnosis is invasive and has potential morbidity, it is reserved for evaluating highly suspicious lesions and not for the majority of oral lesions which are clinically not suspicious. Furthermore, scalpel biopsy has significant interobserver and intraobserver variability in the histologic diagnosis of dysplasia. There is an urgent need to devise critical diagnostic tools for early detection of oral dysplasia and malignancy that are practical, noninvasive and can be easily performed in an out-patient set-up. Diagnostic tests for early detection include brush biopsy, toluidine blue staining, autofluorescence, salivary proteomics, DNA analysis, biomarkers and spectroscopy. This state of the art review critically examines these tests and assesses their value in identifying oral squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 4 2%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 241 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 16%
Student > Master 33 13%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Postgraduate 22 9%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 51 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 8%
Engineering 12 5%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 63 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,665,630
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Head & Neck Oncology
#4
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,242
of 119,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Neck Oncology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 36 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them