↓ Skip to main content

Misconceptions about Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy Expenditure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Misconceptions about Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy Expenditure
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-2-2-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Scott

Abstract

The measurement of gas exchange has played an invaluable role in metabolic interpretation. The uptake of 1 liter of oxygen is often converted into an energy expenditure estimate of 21.1 kilojoules (e.g., 1 L O2 = 21.1 kJ or ~5 kcal). This article demonstrates both the importance of such a conversion and the potential for misinterpretation. Oxygen uptake during heavy and severe exercise will also be discussed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 194 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 20%
Student > Bachelor 37 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 16%
Researcher 20 10%
Professor 12 6%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 27 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 64 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 32 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,638,268
of 22,551,053 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#514
of 880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,199
of 343,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,551,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them