You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developing a curriculum framework for global health in family medicine: emerging principles, competencies, and educational approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-46 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lynda Redwood-Campbell, Barry Pakes, Katherine Rouleau, Colla J MacDonald, Neil Arya, Eva Purkey, Karen Schultz, Reena Dhatt, Briana Wilson, Abdullahel Hadi, Kevin Pottie |
| Abstract |
Recognizing the growing demand from medical students and residents for more comprehensive global health training, and the paucity of explicit curricula on such issues, global health and curriculum experts from the six Ontario Family Medicine Residency Programs worked together to design a framework for global health curricula in family medicine training programs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 64 | 36% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 10% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,141,030
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,943
of 3,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,296
of 118,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.