↓ Skip to main content

Reproducible computational biology experiments with SED-ML - The Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 1,142)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproducible computational biology experiments with SED-ML - The Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-5-198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dagmar Waltemath, Richard Adams, Frank T Bergmann, Michael Hucka, Fedor Kolpakov, Andrew K Miller, Ion I Moraru, David Nickerson, Sven Sahle, Jacky L Snoep, Nicolas Le Novère

Abstract

The increasing use of computational simulation experiments to inform modern biological research creates new challenges to annotate, archive, share and reproduce such experiments. The recently published Minimum Information About a Simulation Experiment (MIASE) proposes a minimal set of information that should be provided to allow the reproduction of simulation experiments among users and software tools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
France 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 111 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 30%
Researcher 33 27%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 26%
Computer Science 30 25%
Engineering 17 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 12%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 13 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,196,008
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#13
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,194
of 242,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.