You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biological effects of power frequency magnetic fields: Neurochemical and toxicological changes in developing chick embryos
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMagnetic Research and Technology, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-044x-2-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P Rajendra, HN Sujatha, D Devendranath, B Gunasekaran, RB Sashidhar, C Subramanyam, Channakeshava |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 49 | 72% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 49 | 72% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BioMagnetic Research and Technology
#10
of 11 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,102
of 147,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMagnetic Research and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them