You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-8-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Murray, Shaun Treweek, Catherine Pope, Anne MacFarlane, Luciana Ballini, Christopher Dowrick, Tracy Finch, Anne Kennedy, Frances Mair, Catherine O'Donnell, Bie Nio Ong, Tim Rapley, Anne Rogers, Carl May |
| Abstract |
The past decade has seen considerable interest in the development and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Such interventions can only have a significant impact on health and health care if they are shown to be effective when tested, are capable of being widely implemented and can be normalised into routine practice. To date, there is still a problematic gap between research and implementation. The Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) addresses the factors needed for successful implementation and integration of interventions into routine work (normalisation). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 52% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 22 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1076 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 208 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 176 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 155 | 14% |
| Other | 69 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 59 | 5% |
| Other | 209 | 19% |
| Unknown | 244 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 283 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 139 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 136 | 12% |
| Psychology | 102 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 33 | 3% |
| Other | 136 | 12% |
| Unknown | 291 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,206,231
of 25,353,525 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#854
of 3,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,716
of 105,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,353,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.