↓ Skip to main content

Simultaneous use of a heat and moisture exchanger and a heated humidifier causes critical airway occlusion in less than 24 hours

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simultaneous use of a heat and moisture exchanger and a heated humidifier causes critical airway occlusion in less than 24 hours
Published in
Critical Care, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/cc14290
Authors

M Mariyaselvam, A Doyle, G Wijewardena, N English, P Young

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2016.
All research outputs
#923,864
of 6,908,690 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#930
of 3,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,461
of 301,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#72
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,908,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.