You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of CLIF-C ACLF score to define a threshold for futility of intensive care support for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2156-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cornelius Engelmann, Karen Louise Thomsen, Nekisa Zakeri, Mohammed Sheikh, Banwari Agarwal, Rajiv Jalan, Rajeshwar P. Mookerjee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 15% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Mexico | 4 | 10% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Chile | 2 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
| Scientists | 5 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 46 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,420,015
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,234
of 6,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,048
of 357,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#36
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.