You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cowpea and abiotic stresses: identification of reference genes for transcriptional profiling by qPCR
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0354-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lidiane Lindinalva Barbosa Amorim, José Ribamar Costa Ferreira-Neto, João Pacífico Bezerra-Neto, Valesca Pandolfi, Flávia Tadeu de Araújo, Mitalle Karen da Silva Matos, Mauro Guida Santos, Ederson Akio Kido, Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,142,343
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#685
of 1,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,659
of 346,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#16
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.