↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical effects of left ventricular midwall fibrosis in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanical effects of left ventricular midwall fibrosis in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12968-015-0221-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin J. Taylor, Fraz Umar, Erica L. S. Lin, Amar Ahmed, William E. Moody, Wojciech Mazur, Berthold Stegemann, Jonathan N. Townend, Richard P. Steeds, Francisco Leyva

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) mid-wall fibrosis (MWF), which occurs in about a quarter of patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), is associated with high risk of pump failure. The mid LV wall is the site of circumferential myocardial fibers. We sought to determine the effect of MWF on LV myocardial mechanics. Patients with NICM (n = 116; age: 62.8 ± 13.2 years; 67 % male) underwent late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and were categorized according to the presence (+) or absence (-) of MWF. Feature tracking (FT) CMR was used to assess myocardial deformation. Despite a similar LVEF (24.3 vs 27.5 %, p = 0.20), patients with MWF (32 [24 %]) had lower global circumferential strain (Ɛcc: -6.6 % vs -9.4 %, P = 0.004), but similar longitudinal (Ɛll: -7.6 % vs. -9.4 %, p = 0.053) and radial (Ɛrr: 14.6 % vs. 17.8 % p = 0.18) strain. Compared with - MWF, + MWF was associated with reduced LV systolic, circumferential strain rate (-0.38 ± 0.1 vs -0.56 ± 0.3 s(-1), p = 0.005) and peak LV twist (4.65 vs. 6.31°, p = 0.004), as well as rigid LV body rotation (64 % vs 28 %, P <0.001). In addition, +MWF was associated with reduced LV diastolic strain rates (DSRcc: 0.34 vs. 0.46 s(-1); DSRll: 0.38 vs. 0.50s(-1); DSRrr: -0.55 vs. -0.75 s(-1); all p <0.05). MWF is associated with reduced LV global circumferential strain, strain rate and torsion. In addition, MWF is associated with rigid LV body rotation and reduced diastolic strain rates. These systolic and diastolic disturbances may be related to the increased risk of pump failure observed in patients with NICM and MWF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Researcher 11 17%
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 56%
Engineering 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,766,176
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#481
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,785
of 400,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#19
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.