↓ Skip to main content

Conservative therapy for the treatment of patients with somatic tinnitus attributed to temporomandibular dysfunction: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservative therapy for the treatment of patients with somatic tinnitus attributed to temporomandibular dysfunction: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2903-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Michiels, Annemarie Christien van der Wal, Evelien Nieste, Paul Van de Heyning, Marc Braem, Corine Visscher, Vedat Topsakal, Annick Gilles, Laure Jacquemin, Marianne Hesters, Willem De Hertogh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Researcher 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 58 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 16%
Psychology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 66 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,214,575
of 13,810,416 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#933
of 3,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,206
of 267,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,810,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them