You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Definition of the viral targets of protective HIV-1-specific T cell responses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-9-208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beatriz Mothe, Anuska Llano, Javier Ibarrondo, Marcus Daniels, Cristina Miranda, Jennifer Zamarreño, Vanessa Bach, Rosario Zuniga, Susana Pérez-Álvarez, Christoph T Berger, Maria C Puertas, Javier Martinez-Picado, Morgane Rolland, Marilu Farfan, James J Szinger, William H Hildebrand, Otto O Yang, Victor Sanchez-Merino, Chanson J Brumme, Zabrina L Brumme, David Heckerman, Todd M Allen, James I Mullins, Guadalupe Gómez, Philip J Goulder, Bruce D Walker, Jose M Gatell, Bonaventura Clotet, Bette T Korber, Jorge Sanchez, Christian Brander |
| Abstract |
The efficacy of the CTL component of a future HIV-1 vaccine will depend on the induction of responses with the most potent antiviral activity and broad HLA class I restriction. However, current HIV vaccine designs are largely based on viral sequence alignments only, not incorporating experimental data on T cell function and specificity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 23 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,524,349
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#257
of 4,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,869
of 242,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.