You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A plea for standards in reporting data collected by animal-borne electronic devices
|
---|---|
Published in |
Animal Biotelemetry, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40317-015-0096-x |
Authors |
Hamish A. Campbell, Ferdi Urbano, Sarah Davidson, Holger Dettki, Francesca Cagnacci |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 4 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
Australia | 2 | 11% |
Chile | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
Finland | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
Scientists | 7 | 39% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belize | 1 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 27% |
Researcher | 14 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 19 | 26% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,069,739
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#26
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,968
of 396,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.