You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-018-1167-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amytis Heim, Philippe Ravaud, Gabriel Baron, Isabelle Boutron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,480,305
of 24,274,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,698
of 3,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,078
of 352,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#58
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,274,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.