You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of an abdominal belt on breathing patterns and scan efficiency in whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: comparison between the UK and Japan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-13-71 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Masaki Ishida, Andreas Schuster, Shinichi Takase, Geraint Morton, Amedeo Chiribiri, Boris Bigalke, Tobias Schaeffter, Hajime Sakuma, Eike Nagel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
Engineering | 4 | 11% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,490,133
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#378
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,244
of 246,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them