↓ Skip to main content

Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach
Published in
Critical Care, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0587-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthieu Biais, Stephan Ehrmann, Arnaud Mari, Benjamin Conte, Yazine Mahjoub, Olivier Desebbe, Julien Pottecher, Karim Lakhal, Dalila Benzekri-Lefevre, Nicolas Molinari, Thierry Boulain, Jean-Yves Lefrant, Laurent Muller, with the collaboration of AzuRea Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Other 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,394,242
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,715
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,694
of 275,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#46
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.