↓ Skip to main content

Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach
Published in
Critical Care, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0587-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthieu Biais, Stephan Ehrmann, Arnaud Mari, Benjamin Conte, Yazine Mahjoub, Olivier Desebbe, Julien Pottecher, Karim Lakhal, Dalila Benzekri-Lefevre, Nicolas Molinari, Thierry Boulain, Jean-Yves Lefrant, Laurent Muller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Turkey 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 89 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Other 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 20 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,321,639
of 19,140,651 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,423
of 5,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,388
of 287,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,140,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.