↓ Skip to main content

Changes in dominant groups of the gut microbiota do not explain cereal-fiber induced improvement of whole-body insulin sensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in dominant groups of the gut microbiota do not explain cereal-fiber induced improvement of whole-body insulin sensitivity
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-8-90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin O Weickert, Ayman M Arafat, Michael Blaut, Carl Alpert, Natalie Becker, Verena Leupelt, Natalia Rudovich, Matthias Möhlig, Andreas FH Pfeiffer

Abstract

Diets high in cereal-fiber (HCF) have been shown to improve whole-body insulin sensitivity. In search for potential mechanisms we hypothesized that a supplemented HCF-diet influences the composition of the human gut microbiota and/or biomarkers of colonic carbohydrate fermentation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Professor 7 7%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2012.
All research outputs
#16,919,456
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#692
of 1,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,397
of 238,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.