You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relation between dietary cadmium intake and biomarkers of cadmium exposure in premenopausal women accounting for body iron stores
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-10-105 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bettina Julin, Marie Vahter, Billy Amzal, Alicja Wolk, Marika Berglund, Agneta Åkesson |
| Abstract |
Cadmium is a widespread environmental pollutant with adverse effects on kidneys and bone, but with insufficiently elucidated public health consequences such as risk of end-stage renal diseases, fractures and cancer. Urinary cadmium is considered a valid biomarker of lifetime kidney accumulation from overall cadmium exposure and thus used in the assessment of cadmium-induced health effects. We aimed to assess the relationship between dietary cadmium intake assessed by analyses of duplicate food portions and cadmium concentrations in urine and blood, taking the toxicokinetics of cadmium into consideration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 80 | 66% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 85 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2012.
All research outputs
#17,652,807
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#1,195
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,888
of 241,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#24
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.