↓ Skip to main content


Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

3 patents


42 Dimensions

Readers on

34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Published in
Critical Care, January 2002
DOI 10.1186/cc1826
Pubmed ID

Patrick M Honoré, James R Matson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
France 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 26%
Student > Postgraduate 6 18%
Other 5 15%
Professor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 74%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 3 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
of 13,583,919 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
of 4,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 262,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,583,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.