↓ Skip to main content

Genomic duplication problems for unrooted gene trees

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic duplication problems for unrooted gene trees
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-2308-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jarosław Paszek, Paweł Górecki

Abstract

Discovering the location of gene duplications and multiple gene duplication episodes is a fundamental issue in evolutionary molecular biology. The problem introduced by Guigó et al. in 1996 is to map gene duplication events from a collection of rooted, binary gene family trees onto theirs corresponding rooted binary species tree in such a way that the total number of multiple gene duplication episodes is minimized. There are several models in the literature that specify how gene duplications from gene families can be interpreted as one duplication episode. However, in all duplication episode problems gene trees are rooted. This restriction limits the applicability, since unrooted gene family trees are frequently inferred by phylogenetic methods. In this article we show the first solution to the open problem of episode clustering where the input gene family trees are unrooted. In particular, by using theoretical properties of unrooted reconciliation, we show an efficient algorithm that reduces this problem into the episode clustering problems defined for rooted trees. We show theoretical properties of the reduction algorithm and evaluation of empirical datasets. We provided algorithms and tools that were successfully applied to several empirical datasets. In particular, our comparative study shows that we can improve known results on genomic duplication inference from real datasets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 57%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Computer Science 2 29%
Mathematics 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,287,654
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,735
of 10,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,938
of 394,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#61
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.