You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical Failures and History Lessons: The U.S. Public Health Service Research Studies in Tuskegee and Guatemala
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Health Reviews, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03391665 |
| Authors |
Susan M. Reverby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 29% |
| Finland | 3 | 13% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,347,093
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#34
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,401
of 178,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.