You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Field assessment of potential sugar feeding stations for disseminating bacteria in a paratransgenic approach to control malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-018-2516-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Etienne Bilgo, Amélie Vantaux, Antoine Sanon, Seni Ilboudo, Roch K. Dabiré, Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena, Abdoulaye Diabate |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,578,585
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,534
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,183
of 353,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#72
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.