You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Raising cigarette excise tax to reduce consumption in low-and middle-income countries of the Asia-Pacific region:a simulation of the anticipated health and taxation revenues impacts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6096-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li-Ming Ho, Christian Schafferer, Jie-Min Lee, Chun-Yuan Yeh, Chi-Jung Hsieh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Poland | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 6% |
| Israel | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 68 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 23 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 70 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,721,386
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,996
of 17,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,310
of 361,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#30
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.