You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fecal source identification using random forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-018-0568-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adélaïde Roguet, A. Murat Eren, Ryan J Newton, Sandra L McLellan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,029,995
of 24,931,592 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,378
of 1,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,542
of 354,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#54
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,931,592 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.