You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient and public involvement in primary care research - an example of ensuring its sustainability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-016-0015-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clare Jinks, Pam Carter, Carol Rhodes, Robert Taylor, Roger Beech, Krysia Dziedzic, Steven Blackburn, Rhian Hughes, Bie Nio Ong |
| Abstract |
The international literature on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research covers a wide range of issues, including active lay involvement throughout the research cycle; roles that patients/public can play; assessing impact of PPI and recommendations for good PPI practice. One area of investigation that is less developed is the sustainability and impact of PPI beyond involvement in time-limited research projects. This paper focuses on the issues of sustainability, the importance of institutional leadership and the creation of a robust infrastructure in order to achieve long-term and wide-ranging PPI in research strategy and programmes. We use the case of a Primary Care Research Centre to provide a historical account of the evolution of PPI in the Centre and identified a number of key conceptual issues regarding infrastructure, resource allocation, working methods, roles and relationships. The paper concludes about the more general applicability of the Centre's model for the long-term sustainability of PPI in research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 39% |
| Canada | 4 | 13% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 26% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 29% |
| Psychology | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,610,401
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#144
of 403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,697
of 399,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.