↓ Skip to main content

Complex regulation of ADAR-mediated RNA-editing across tissues

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complex regulation of ADAR-mediated RNA-editing across tissues
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-2291-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie A. Huntley, Melanie Lou, Leonard D. Goldstein, Michael Lawrence, Gerrit J.P. Dijkgraaf, Joshua S. Kaminker, Robert Gentleman

Abstract

RNA-editing is a tightly regulated, and essential cellular process for a properly functioning brain. Dysfunction of A-to-I RNA editing can have catastrophic effects, particularly in the central nervous system. Thus, understanding how the process of RNA-editing is regulated has important implications for human health. However, at present, very little is known about the regulation of editing across tissues, and individuals. Here we present an analysis of RNA-editing patterns from 9 different tissues harvested from a single mouse. For comparison, we also analyzed data for 5 of these tissues harvested from 15 additional animals. We find that tissue specificity of editing largely reflects differential expression of substrate transcripts across tissues. We identified a surprising enrichment of editing in intronic regions of brain transcripts, that could account for previously reported higher levels of editing in brain. There exists a small but remarkable amount of editing which is tissue-specific, despite comparable expression levels of the edit site across multiple tissues. Expression levels of editing enzymes and their isoforms can explain some, but not all of this variation. Together, these data suggest a complex regulation of the RNA-editing process beyond transcript expression levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,782,514
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,569
of 10,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,244
of 395,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#211
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.