↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of sample characteristics in two pregnancy cohorts: community-based versus population-based recruitment methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of sample characteristics in two pregnancy cohorts: community-based versus population-based recruitment methods
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brenda MY Leung, Sheila W McDonald, Bonnie J Kaplan, Gerald F Giesbrecht, Suzanne C Tough

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 26%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 30%
Psychology 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,274,819
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,242
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,666
of 308,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.