↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of a new wrist-worn accelerometer with a commonly used triaxial accelerometer under free-living conditions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of a new wrist-worn accelerometer with a commonly used triaxial accelerometer under free-living conditions
Published in
BMC Research Notes, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13104-018-3849-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sachiko Sasaki, Shigekazu Ukawa, Emiko Okada, Zhao Wenjing, Tomoko Kishi, Ai Sakamoto, Akiko Tamakoshi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 8 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Computer Science 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,427,892
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,979
of 4,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,099
of 349,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#54
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.