↓ Skip to main content

Psychosocial family factors and glycemic control among children aged 1-15 years with type 1 diabetes: a population-based survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychosocial family factors and glycemic control among children aged 1-15 years with type 1 diabetes: a population-based survey
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-11-118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Haugstvedt, Tore Wentzel-Larsen, Berit Rokne, Marit Graue

Abstract

Being the parents of children with diabetes is demanding. Jay Belsky's determinants of parenting model emphasizes both the personal psychological resources, the characteristics of the child and contextual sources such as parents' work, marital relations and social network support as important determinants for parenting. To better understand the factors influencing parental functioning among parents of children with type 1 diabetes, we aimed to investigate associations between the children's glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and 1) variables related to the parents' psychological and contextual resources, and 2) frequency of blood glucose measurement as a marker for diabetes-related parenting behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 6 5%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 36%
Psychology 22 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2011.
All research outputs
#2,855,791
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#422
of 2,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,418
of 243,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.