↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: The majority of total nuclear-encoded non-ribosomal RNA in a human cell is 'dark matter' un-annotated RNA

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: The majority of total nuclear-encoded non-ribosomal RNA in a human cell is 'dark matter' un-annotated RNA
Published in
BMC Biology, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-9-86
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Kapranov, Georges St Laurent, Tal Raz, Fatih Ozsolak, C Patrick Reynolds, Poul HB Sorensen, Gregory Reaman, Patrice Milos, Robert J Arceci, John F Thompson, Timothy J Triche

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Researcher 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Computer Science 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Chemistry 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2011.
All research outputs
#11,053,305
of 12,434,464 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#1,090
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,848
of 220,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#54
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,434,464 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.