You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A study of the value of requesting information from drug manufacturers for systematic reviews; 9 years of experience from the drug effectiveness review project
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0834-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marian S. McDonagh, Sujata Thakurta, Kim Peterson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 10 | 28% |
Germany | 3 | 8% |
United States | 3 | 8% |
Canada | 3 | 8% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Philippines | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 67% |
Scientists | 7 | 19% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,049,524
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#330
of 2,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,768
of 361,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#10
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.