You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hand-grip strength is a simple and effective outcome predictor in esophageal cancer following esophagectomy with reconstruction: a prospective study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-6-98 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chih-Hao Chen, Ho-Chang, Yi-Zhen Huang, Tzu-Ti Hung |
Abstract |
Surgery for esophageal cancer usually carries considerable complication and mortality rate. Adequate preoperative evaluation is mandatory to decrease complication rate. Hand-grip strength is a useful measure to assess the extent of aging, nutrition and patient's overall condition. Because preoperative nutrition state and physiologic aging process play important roles in postoperative recovery, we would like to know if hand-grip strength is an adequate tool for such evaluation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 6 | 55% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 109 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 20% |
Unknown | 33 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 39 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,787,786
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#74
of 1,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,381
of 121,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.