↓ Skip to main content

A league of their own: demographics, motivations and patterns of use of 1,955 male adult non-medical anabolic steroid users in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A league of their own: demographics, motivations and patterns of use of 1,955 male adult non-medical anabolic steroid users in the United States
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-4-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason Cohen, Rick Collins, Jack Darkes, Daniel Gwartney

Abstract

Rule violations among elite-level sports competitors and tragedies among adolescents have largely defined the issue of non-medical anabolic-androgenic steroid (NMAAS) use for the public and policy makers. However, the predominant and oft-ignored segment of the NMAAS community exists in the general population that is neither participating in competitive sports nor adolescent. A clearer profile of NMAAS users within the general population is an initial step in developing a full understanding of NMAAS use and devising appropriate policy and interventions. This survey sought to provide a more comprehensive profile of NMAAS users by accessing a large sample of user respondents from around the United States.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 139 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Master 18 12%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 33 23%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 18%
Sports and Recreations 16 11%
Social Sciences 14 10%
Psychology 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 43 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,006,182
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#239
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,244
of 446,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#224
of 856 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 856 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.