↓ Skip to main content

An evidence-based health workforce model for primary and community care

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An evidence-based health workforce model for primary and community care
Published in
Implementation Science, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonie Segal, Matthew J Leach

Abstract

The delivery of best practice care can markedly improve clinical outcomes in patients with chronic disease. While the provision of a skilled, multidisciplinary team is pivotal to the delivery of best practice care, the occupational or skill mix required to deliver this care is unclear; it is also uncertain whether such a team would have the capacity to adequately address the complex needs of the clinic population. This is the role of needs-based health workforce planning. The objective of this article is to describe the development of an evidence-informed, needs-based health workforce model to support the delivery of best-practice interdisciplinary chronic disease management in the primary and community care setting using diabetes as a case exemplar.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 138 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 36 25%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Social Sciences 17 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 28 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,333,677
of 21,453,375 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#972
of 1,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,442
of 250,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#23
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,453,375 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.