↓ Skip to main content

Narrative exposure therapy for PTSD increases top-down processing of aversive stimuli - evidence from a randomized controlled treatment trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Narrative exposure therapy for PTSD increases top-down processing of aversive stimuli - evidence from a randomized controlled treatment trial
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-12-127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Adenauer, Claudia Catani, Hannah Gola, Julian Keil, Martina Ruf, Maggie Schauer, Frank Neuner

Abstract

Little is known about the neurobiological foundations of psychotherapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Prior studies have shown that PTSD is associated with altered processing of threatening and aversive stimuli. It remains unclear whether this functional abnormality can be changed by psychotherapy. This is the first randomized controlled treatment trial that examines whether narrative exposure therapy (NET) causes changes in affective stimulus processing in patients with chronic PTSD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 263 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 17%
Researcher 36 13%
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 10%
Other 51 19%
Unknown 47 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 136 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 14%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 56 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,278,116
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#210
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,982
of 224,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#14
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.