You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Narrative exposure therapy for PTSD increases top-down processing of aversive stimuli - evidence from a randomized controlled treatment trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-12-127 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah Adenauer, Claudia Catani, Hannah Gola, Julian Keil, Martina Ruf, Maggie Schauer, Frank Neuner |
| Abstract |
Little is known about the neurobiological foundations of psychotherapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Prior studies have shown that PTSD is associated with altered processing of threatening and aversive stimuli. It remains unclear whether this functional abnormality can be changed by psychotherapy. This is the first randomized controlled treatment trial that examines whether narrative exposure therapy (NET) causes changes in affective stimulus processing in patients with chronic PTSD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 291 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 9% |
| Other | 55 | 18% |
| Unknown | 67 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 139 | 46% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Unknown | 78 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,612,820
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#251
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,982
of 242,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.