↓ Skip to main content

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2004
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-4-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marion K Campbell, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Diana R Elbourne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor 7 6%
Other 31 26%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 39%
Social Sciences 14 12%
Psychology 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 20 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,063,508
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,047
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,207
of 58,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.