↓ Skip to main content

Needs and barriers to improve the collaboration in oral anticoagulant therapy: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Needs and barriers to improve the collaboration in oral anticoagulant therapy: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-11-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanneke W Drewes, Mattijs S Lambooij, Caroline A Baan, Bert R Meijboom, Wilco C Graafmans, Gert P Westert

Abstract

Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) involves many health care disciplines. Even though collaboration between care professionals is assumed to improve the quality of OAT, very little research has been done into the practice of OAT management to arrange and manage the collaboration. This study aims to identify the problems in collaboration experienced by the care professionals involved, the solutions they proposed to improve collaboration, and the barriers they encountered to the implementation of these solutions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2011.
All research outputs
#9,934,716
of 12,410,115 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#541
of 779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,976
of 222,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#23
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,410,115 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 779 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.