↓ Skip to main content

Education and training for implementation science: our interest in manuscripts describing education and training materials

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Education and training for implementation science: our interest in manuscripts describing education and training materials
Published in
Implementation Science, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13012-015-0326-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon E. Straus, Anne Sales, Michel Wensing, Susan Michie, Bridie Kent, Robbie Foy

Abstract

Alongside the growth in interest in implementation science, there has been a marked increase in training programs, educational courses, degrees, and other offerings in implementation research and practice to meet the demand for this expertise. We believe that the science of capacity building has matured but that we can advance it further by shining light on excellent work in this area and by highlighting gaps for future research. At Implementation Science, we regularly receive manuscripts that describe or evaluate training materials, competencies, and competency development in implementation curricula. We are announcing a renewed interest in manuscripts in this area, with specifications described below.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Social Sciences 6 14%
Psychology 4 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,164,031
of 20,457,135 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#261
of 1,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,062
of 367,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,457,135 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.