↓ Skip to main content

What can global health institutions do to help strengthen health systems in low income countries?

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What can global health institutions do to help strengthen health systems in low income countries?
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-8-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dina Balabanova, Martin McKee, Anne Mills, Gill Walt, Andy Haines

Abstract

Weaknesses in health systems contribute to a failure to improve health outcomes in developing countries, despite increased official development assistance. Changes in the demands on health systems, as well as their scope to respond, mean that the situation is likely to become more problematic in the future. Diverse global initiatives seek to strengthen health systems, but progress will require better coordination between them, use of strategies based on the best available evidence obtained especially from evaluation of large scale programs, and improved global aid architecture that supports these processes. This paper sets out the case for global leadership to support health systems investments and help ensure the synergies between vertical and horizontal programs that are essential for effective functioning of health systems. At national level, it is essential to increase capacity to manage and deliver services, situate interventions firmly within national strategies, ensure effective implementation, and co-ordinate external support with local resources. Health systems performance should be monitored, with clear lines of accountability, and reforms should build on evidence of what works in what circumstances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
United States 3 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 348 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 25%
Researcher 49 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 9%
Student > Bachelor 31 8%
Student > Postgraduate 24 6%
Other 72 19%
Unknown 68 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 33%
Social Sciences 66 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 4%
Arts and Humanities 11 3%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 78 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,651,408
of 24,673,288 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#641
of 1,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,472
of 98,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,673,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.