You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Arsenic, cadmium and neuron specific enolase (ENO2, γ-enolase) expression in breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Cell International, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2867-11-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maureen A Soh, Scott H Garrett, Seema Somji, Jane R Dunlevy, Xu Dong Zhou, Mary Ann Sens, Chandra S Bathula, Christina Allen, Donald A Sens |
| Abstract |
Neuron specific enolase (ENO2, γ-enolase) has been used as a biomarker to help identify neuroendocrine differentiation in breast cancer. The goal of the present study was to determine if ENO2 expression in the breast epithelial cell is influenced by the environmental pollutants, arsenite and cadmium. Acute and chronic exposure of MCF-10A cells to As+3 and Cd+2 sufficient to allow colony formation in soft agar, was used to determine if ENO2 expression was altered by these pollutants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Portugal | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 24% |
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2011.
All research outputs
#18,303,139
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell International
#1,051
of 1,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,706
of 238,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell International
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,765 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.