You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine in sepsis: a review of the biologic rationale and the present state of clinical evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2217-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ari Moskowitz, Lars W. Andersen, David T. Huang, Katherine M. Berg, Anne V. Grossestreuer, Paul E. Marik, Robert L. Sherwin, Peter C. Hou, Lance B. Becker, Michael N. Cocchi, Pratik Doshi, Jonathan Gong, Ayan Sen, Michael W. Donnino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 215 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 11% |
| Mexico | 23 | 11% |
| Colombia | 12 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 4% |
| Spain | 8 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Dominican Republic | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 18% |
| Unknown | 82 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 165 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 15% |
| Scientists | 14 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 348 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 54 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 42 | 12% |
| Researcher | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 76 | 22% |
| Unknown | 77 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 196 | 56% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 6% |
| Unknown | 94 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#198,588
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#81
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,004
of 367,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.